The NRA steadfastly maintains that the 30, gun-related deaths and , assaults with firearms in the United States every year are a small price to pay to guarantee freedom. And when gun enthusiasts talk about Constitutional liberties guaranteed by the Second Amendment, they are referring to freedom in a general sense, but they also have something more specific in mindfreedom from government oppression. They argue that the only way to keep federal authority in check is to arm individual citizens who can, if necessary, defend themselves from an aggressive government.
In the past decade, this view of the proper relationship between government and individual rights and the insistence on a role for private violence in a democracy has been co-opted by the conservative movement. As a result, it has spread beyond extreme "militia" groups to influence state and national policy.
In Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea , Josh Horwitz and Casey Anderson reveal that the proponents of this view base their argument on a deliberate misreading of history. The Insurrectionist myth has been forged by twisting the facts of the American Revolution and the founding of the United States, the denial of civil rights to African-Americans after the Civil War, and the rise of the Third Reich under Adolf Hitler. Here, Horwitz and Anderson set the record straight. Then, challenging the proposition that more guns equal more freedom, they expose Insurrectionismnot government oppressionas the true threat to freedom in the U.
He has spent nearly two decades working on gun violence prevention issues. He lives in Arlington, Virginia.
Byron Goines explains the insurrectionist interpretation of the Second Amendment that has been utilized for years by pro-gun facets of society to deceive. Editorial Reviews. From the Author. Byron Goines Website byronmeshellegoines. com.
Casey Anderson holds a law degree from Georgetown University and is currently a lawyer in private practice in Washington, D. He has served in senior staff positions with the U. More to explore Recently published by academic presses.
Results by Title. Legal and public policies concerning youth gun violence tend to rely heavily on crime reports, survey data, and statistical methods. Rarely is attention given to the young voices belonging to those who carry high-powered semiautomatic handguns. In Language of the Gun, Bernard E.
Some evidence suggests that, in this extreme case, the buy-back saved lives Reuter and Mouzos For that reason, the design, distribution and uses of guns are widely regulated. Changing Course in Latin America. Although each audiobook project requires a lot of time to complete, we welcome customer suggestions concerning topics they would like us to cover. Why do many Christians place gun rights ahead of even reasonable middle ground restrictions on gun ownership? Hunting is on the decline. Surveys of prisoners and others who have been or are active offenders document a diverse terrain of transactions, only about half of which involve an instance in which cash or other items of value are exchanged for property rights to a gun.
Harcourt recounts in-depth interviews with youths detained at an all-malecorrectional facility, exploring how they talk about guns and what meanings they ascribe to them in a broader attempt to understand some of the assumptions implicit in current handgun policies. In the process, Harcourt redraws the relationships among empirical research, law, and public policy. Home to over repeat offenders ranging in age from twelve to seventeen, the Catalina Mountain School is made up of a particular stratum of boys—those who have committed the most offenses but will still be released upon reaching adulthood.
In an effort to understand the symbolic and emotional language of guns and gun carrying, Harcourt interviewed dozens of these incarcerated Catalina boys.
What do these youths see in guns? What draws them to handguns?
Why do some of them carry and others not? For Harcourt, their often surprising answers unveil many of the presuppositions that influence our laws and policies.
He has dissected the various aspects of the gun violence epidemic in the United States into its component parts and considered them separately. He has produced a scientifically based analysis of the data and indeed the microdata of the over 30, deaths and 75, injuries which occur each year. Byron Goines explains the insurrectionist interpretation of the Second Amendment that has been utilized for years by pro-gun facets of society to deceive Americans. The Constitution of the United States of America is clearly against insurrections yet pro-gun facets of society continue to deceive Americans by saying the Second Amendment gives them the right to bear arms in order to rise up against a tyrannical government which is clearly an insurrection.
Bearing arms against the United States government is an insurrection and rebellion against the United States and the Constitution specifically addresses insurrections in detail and is totally against insurrections throughout. Byron Goines explains insurrections and how they are addressed as treason in the Constitution of the United States of America along with the Constitutional penalty for elected representatives who engage in insurrection or rebellion against the United States.
Learn what the Constitution says about insurrections as Byron Goines gives a Constitutional exegesis debunking the deceptive insurrectionist Second Amendment interpretation given by pro-gun facets of society.
Create Widget. About Byron Goines. Also by This Author. Report this book. Reason for report: — Select a reason — Book is or contains spam Book infringes copyright Same content is published elsewhere with different author for ex.